Evaluating the Efficacy of Covid-19 Intervention in Pakistan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Safyan Shams
Muhammad Imran Khan

Abstract

Since the last two decades, public policy around the world, specifically in first-world countries has been guided by behavioral insights to nudge people to increase the efficacy of government interventions and policies. In this context, this study analyzes the effectiveness of government interventions and policies regarding the COVID-19 pandemic by finding if any of these were behaviorally informed and whether any behavioral insights were considered. For this purpose, focus group discussions, and episodic and semi-structured interviews were conducted with the representatives of government institutions, medical experts, and recovered patients of COVID-19. Consequently, the results depicted that only interventions and policies regarding precautionary measures, risk communication, and vaccination were behaviorally informed while none of the behavioral insights were intentionally taken into consideration but some aspects of progressive, regressive, educative, and architectural behavioral insights were identified in the COVID-19 interventions of government and the educative one performed most effectively. Moreover, emotional nudges and national and group reinforcement bias were also identified in the government interventions. Based on the results, this study emphasizes the need for the government to develop its behavioral insight team to conduct surveys and experimental-based studies to develop its behavioral insights based on its regional environmental characteristics.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Shams, S. and Khan, M.I. 2024. Evaluating the Efficacy of Covid-19 Intervention in Pakistan. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 3 (Sep. 2024), 230–242. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00339.

References

  1. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods 4th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Cutter, D. M. (2004). Behavioral Health Interventions: What Works and Why. National Research Council (US) Panel on Race, Ethnicity, and Health in Later Life.
  3. Fabbro, G. D. (2021). Nudging and COVID-19: Behavioral Insights as Policy Tools in the Fight Against the Virus. Rivista di BioDiritto, 191-219.
  4. FDI, MNHSRC. (2021, June 24). National deployment and vaccination plan for COVID-19 vaccines . Retrieved from ADB: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/linked-documents/55013-001-sd-04.pdf
  5. Jensen, U., Ayers, S., & Koskan, A. (2021). Video-based Messages to Reduce COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Nudge Uptake. Cornell University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/df9qw
  6. Krawiec, J. M., Piaskowska, O. M., Piesiewicz, P. F., & Bialaszek, W. (2021). Tools for Public Health Policy: Nudges and Boosts as Active Support of the Law in Special Situations such as COVID-19 Pandemic. Globalization and Health. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8sepk
  7. Mahmood, S., Hussain, T., Mahmood, F., Ahmed, M., Majeed, A., Beg, B. M., & Areej, S. (2020). Attitude, Perception, and Knowlege of COVID-19 among General Public in Pakistan. Frontiers in Public Health. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.602434
  8. MNHSRC. (2020, December 11). Guidelines for mandatory use of face mask. Retrieved from NIH: https://www.nih.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/20201211-Guidelines-for-mandatory-use-of-face-mask_1705.pdf
  9. MNHSRC. (2020, September 26). Home quarantine during COVID-19 outbreak. Retrieved from NIH: https://www.nih.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/20200926-Guidelines-for-Home-Quarantine-for-Contacts-and-International-Travelers_0403.pdf
  10. MNHSRC. (2020, March 13). National Action Plan. Retrieved from NIH: https://www.nih.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-19-NAP-V2-13-March-2020.pdf
  11. MNHSRC. (2020, March 26). Social distancing during COVID-19 outbreak. Retrieved from NIH: https://www.nih.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/20200326-Guidelines-for-Soial-Distancing-0601.pdf
  12. MNHSRC. (2022, January 21). Home isolation and discharge during COVID-19. Retrieved from NIH: https://www.nih.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/20220121-Guidelines-for-Home-Isolation-and-Discharge-during-COVID-19_-0604.pdf
  13. NCOC. (2021). Final Guidelines for Smart Lockdown. Islamabad: NCOC.
  14. Pohl, R. F. (2016). Cognitive Illusions. Abingdon: Routledge Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696935
  15. Sasaki, S., Saito, T., & Ohtake, F. (2021). Nudges for COVID-19 Voluntary Vaccination: How to Explain Peer Information. Graduate School of Economics Osaka University Discussion Papers in Economics and Business. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3866284
  16. Schubert, C. (2017). Exploring the (behavioural) political economy of nudging. Journal of Institutional Economics, 499–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000448
  17. Soete, L. (2020). Hammer or Nudge? Science-based Policy Advice in COVID-19 Pandemic. United Nations University Policy Brief.
  18. Strabheim, H. (2020). The Rise and Spread of Behavioral Public Policy: An Opportunity for Critical Research and Self Reflection. International Review of Public Policy, 115-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.897
  19. Sunstein, C. R. (2020). Behavioral Science and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108973144
  20. Sunstein, C. R. (2020). How Fun Might Move the World. Decision Lab.
  21. Sunstein, C. R. (2021, November 25). SSRN. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3971921.
  22. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. New York: Penguin.
  23. The News. (2021, November 04). KP govt establishes the Behavioural Insights Unit. Retrieved from The News: https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/905883-kp-govt-establishes-behavioural-insights-unit