Servant Leadership and Entrepreneurial Performance of SME’s: Testing the Effects of Pro-Social Motivation and Duty Orientation

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 31, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00173
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Umer Mukhtar
Faculty of Business and Commerce, GIFT University, Pakistan
Majida Shahzadi
Faculty of Business and Commerce, GIFT University, Pakistan
Amjad Ali
The European School of Leadership & Management, Belgium
Hafiz Muhammad Abubakar Siddique
Faculty of Business and Commerce, GIFT University, Pakistan

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of servant leadership on entrepreneurial performance with the mediating role of duty orientation and moderating role of pro-social motivation. Small and medium-sized firms (SMEs) are essential for the growth of the global economy because they encourage innovation and employment creation. Modern leadership models such as servant leadership put the needs of their followers first, inspiring them and promoting organizational success. In today's fast-paced company climate, entrepreneurial performance is essential. Servant leadership inspires people and promotes an innovative and trusting culture. Duty orientation encourages dedication and responsibility, which strengthens the relationship between servant leadership and entrepreneurial performance. Entrepreneurial activity is encouraged by pro-social motivation, which is driven by a sense of social duty. This strengthens the link between entrepreneurial success and servant leadership. This study used cross-sectional data from 120 employers and employees from small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to explore the impact of servant leadership on entrepreneurial performance with the mediating role of duty orientation and moderating role of pro-social motivation. The data collected were analyzed using SEM, in Smartpls4. All hypotheses proposed in this study were accepted. Findings proved that servant leadership has a significant positive influence on entrepreneurial performance. Findings also proved that duty orientation significantly mediates the relationship between servant leadership and Entrepreneurial performance. Findings suggest that Pro-social motivation moderates the relationship between servant leadership and entrepreneurial performance. Companies should focus and foster servant leadership within their leadership ranks, putting a strong emphasis on empathy and a supportive workplace environment, in order to increase organizational success. All levels of leadership can benefit from these traits being ingrained through leadership development and training programs. Additionally, encouraging a sense of responsibility in workers through training initiatives that place a strong emphasis on accountability can help businesses perform better. Pro-social motivation can further connect with servant leadership concepts and assist entrepreneurial activities by being acknowledged and valued in hiring and performance assessments.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Mukhtar, U. , Shahzadi, M. , Ali, A. and Siddique, H.M.A. 2024. Servant Leadership and Entrepreneurial Performance of SME’s: Testing the Effects of Pro-Social Motivation and Duty Orientation. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 1 (Mar. 2024), 139–148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00173.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K., & Hamad, M. (2020). Servant leadership and academics’ engagement in higher education: Mediation analysis. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(6), 617-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1774036
  2. Aboramadan, M., Hamid, Z., Kundi, Y. M., & El Hamalawi, E. (2022). The effect of servant leadership on employees' extra‐role behaviors in NPOs: The role of work engagement. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33(1), 109-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21505
  3. Ampofo, E. T., Karatepe, O. M., Mensah, I., & Wilberforce, M. T. (2023). The effect of employee recognition on restaurant employees’ job embeddedness, knowledge sharing and service orientation: Abusive supervision as a moderator. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2022-0036
  4. Ansong, A., Agyeiwaa, A. A., & Gnankob, R. I. (2022). Responsible leadership, job satisfaction and duty orientation: Lessons from the manufacturing sector in Ghana. European Business Review, 34(6), 921-935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-12-2021-0261
  5. Arshad, M., Abid, G., & Torres, F. V. C. (2021). Impact of prosocial motivation on organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange. Quality & Quantity, 55, 133-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00997-5
  6. Bavik, A. (2020). A systematic review of the servant leadership literature in management and hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(1), 347-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2018-0788
  7. Bhatti, S. H., Irshad, R., Shehzad, N., & Santoro, G. (2023). Exploring the mediating role of social capital and pro-social motivation in the relationship between CSR and creative deviance. Journal of Intellectual Capital. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2022-0129
  8. Cortez, R. M., & Johnston, W. J. (2020). The coronavirus crisis in B2B settings: Crisis uniqueness and managerial implications based on social exchange theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 125-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.004
  9. Figueroa-Domecq, C., De Jong, A., & Williams, A. M. (2020). Gender, tourism & entrepreneurship: A critical review. Annals of Tourism Research, 84, 102980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102980
  10. Gupta, B. B., Gaurav, A., Panigrahi, P. K., & Arya, V. (2023). Analysis of artificial intelligence-based technologies and approaches on sustainable entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122152
  11. Halberstadt, J., Niemand, T., Kraus, S., Rexhepi, G., Jones, P., & Kailer, N. (2021). Social entrepreneurship orientation: Drivers of success for start-ups and established industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 94, 137-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.06.012
  12. Hernaus, T., & Černe, M. (2022). Trait and/or situation for evasive knowledge hiding? Multiple versus mixed-motives perspective of trait competitiveness and prosocial motivation in low-and high-trust work relationships. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(6), 854-868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2077197
  13. Hossain, M. U., & Asheq, A. A. (2020). Do leadership orientation and proactive personality influence social entrepreneurial intention? International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 19(2), 109-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMED.2020.107396
  14. Huning, T. M., Hurt, K. J., & Frieder, R. E. (2020). The effect of servant leadership, perceived organizational support, job satisfaction and job embeddedness on turnover intentions: An empirical investigation. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-06-2019-0049
  15. Jha, P., & Alam, M. M. (2022). Antecedents of women entrepreneurs’ performance: An empirical perspective. Management Decision, 60(1), 86-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2020-0849
  16. Karatepe, O. M., & Kim, T. T. (2023). Job crafting and critical work-related performance outcomes among cabin attendants: Sequential mediation impacts of calling orientation and work engagement. Tourism Management Perspectives, 45, 101065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101065
  17. Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., Ahmed, S. S., Islam, T., & Khan, E. (2022). The contagious servant leadership: Exploring the role of servant leadership in leading employees to servant colleagueship. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 847-861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2021-0305
  18. Le, T. T., Behl, A., & Pereira, V. (2022). Establishing linkages between circular economy practices and sustainable performance: The moderating role of circular economy entrepreneurship. Management Decision. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2022-0150
  19. McBee-Black, K. (2023). Duty to all: Exploring the role of moral duty in the development of adaptive apparel design innovations. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 27(4), 683-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2022-0046
  20. Meuser, J. D., & Smallfield, J. (2023). Servant leadership: The missing community component. Business Horizons, 66(2), 251-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.07.002
  21. Olanrewaju, A.-S. T., Hossain, M. A., Whiteside, N., & Mercieca, P. (2020). Social media and entrepreneurship research: A literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 90-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.011
  22. Park, H. (2021). Financial behavior among young adult consumers: The influence of self-determination and financial psychology. Young Consumers, 22(4), 597-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-12-2020-1263
  23. Park, H., & Hur, W.-M. (2023). Customer showrooming behavior, customer orientation, and emotional labor: Sales control as a moderator. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103268
  24. Qiu, S., & Dooley, L. (2022). How servant leadership affects organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating roles of perceived procedural justice and trust. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(3), 350-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2021-0146
  25. Rabiul, M. K., Patwary, A. K., & Panha, I. (2022). The role of servant leadership, self-efficacy, high performance work systems, and work engagement in increasing service-oriented behavior. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(4), 504-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.1990169
  26. Raharjo, I. B., Ausat, A. M. A., Risdwiyanto, A., Gadzali, S. S., & Azzaakiyyah, H. K. (2023). Analysing the relationship between entrepreneurship education, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial performance. Journal on Education, 5(4), 11566-11574.
  27. Santos-Vijande, M. L., López-Sánchez, J. Á., Loredo, E., Rudd, J., & López-Mielgo, N. (2022). Role of innovation and architectural marketing capabilities in channelling entrepreneurship into performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100174
  28. Singh, R., Singh, R. K., & Shukla, K. (2022). Salesperson’s spiritual response to job burnout: The role of karma and the moderating impact of thought self-leadership. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(12), 2442-2452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-08-2021-0403
  29. Song, B., & Ferguson, M. A. (2023). The importance of congruence between stakeholder prosocial motivation and CSR attributions: Effects on stakeholders’ donations and sense-making of prosocial identities. Journal of Marketing Communications, 29(4), 339-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2021.2021971
  30. Suwanto, S., Sunarsi, D., & Achmad, W. (2022). Effect of transformational leadership, servant leadership, and digital transformation on MSMEs performance and work innovation capabilities. Central European Management Journal, 30(4), 751-762.
  31. Tiwari, P., Bhat, A. K., & Tikoria, J. (2022). Mediating role of prosocial motivation in predicting social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 118-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1755993
  32. Wang, Z., Meng, L., & Cai, S. (2019). Servant leadership and innovative behavior: A moderated mediation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(8), 505-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0499
  33. Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Chow, C. W. C. (2022). Why and when proactive employees take charge at work: The role of servant leadership and prosocial motivation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1934449
  34. Yamini, R., Soloveva, D., & Peng, X. (2022). What inspires social entrepreneurship? The role of prosocial motivation, intrinsic motivation, and gender in forming social entrepreneurial intention. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 12(2), 71-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2019-0129
  35. Zarei, M., Supphellen, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2022). Servant leadership in marketing: A critical review and a model of creativity-effects. Journal of Business Research, 153, 172-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.013
  36. Zhang, X., Tian, G., Ma, C., Tian, Y., Li, Z., & Liang, L. (2021). “Too much of a good thing?” Exploring the dark side of empowering leadership by linking it with unethical pro-organizational behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(1), 32-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2020-0033
  37. Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z., Lu, Y., & Ding, M. (2023). Standing in others' shoes: The role of leader prosocial motivation in facilitating employee creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 32(1), 58-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12542

Most read articles by the same author(s)