The Role of TikTok in Mental Health Support: Analyzing the Efficacy and Risks of Mental Health Content

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00325
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Zanib Jabbar
Institute of southern Punjab Multan
Hira Khan
Department of Applied Psychology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan
Aysha Zummer
Lahore Garrison University

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of mental health content on TikTok, focusing on engagement, algorithm-driven recommendations, and gender-based differences in content effectiveness. Utilizing a quantitative research design, the study analyzed data from 350 university students in Punjab, Pakistan. The research aimed to evaluate how engagement with TikTok's mental health content correlates with user satisfaction and perceived mental health improvements. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, correlation, and regression, revealed significant findings: higher engagement with mental health content was positively associated with self-reported mental health benefits (Pearson r = 0.65, p < 0.001), and TikTok’s algorithm-driven recommendations significantly enhanced user satisfaction (B = 0.55, β = 0.62, p < 0.001). Gender differences were notably observed, with females finding emotional support content more effective (M = 4.35, SD = 0.85) compared to males, who preferred practical solutions (M = 3.90, SD = 0.92), supported by a t-value of 4.45 (p < 0.001). These results underscore the importance of tailoring mental health content to gender-specific preferences and optimizing algorithm-driven recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of digital mental health resources on platforms like TikTok.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Jabbar, Z. , Khan, H. and Zummer, A. 2024. The Role of TikTok in Mental Health Support: Analyzing the Efficacy and Risks of Mental Health Content. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 3 (Sep. 2024), 107–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00325.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/
  2. Baker, A., & Smith, J. (2024). The role of user-generated content in mental health support: A review of TikTok's impact. Journal of Digital Mental Health, 15(2), 78-92.
  3. Baker,. (2024). The Ephemeral Nature of TikTok Content and Its Impact on Mental Health Understanding. Journal of Digital Mental Health, 15(1), 58-72.
  4. Chen, A., & Kim, J. (2019). Variability in the quality of mental health information on social media: A critical review. Journal of Social Media Studies, 12(3), 102-115.
  5. Dey, A., Ghosh, S., & Sharma, A. (2016). Gender differences in online problem-solving behaviors: Implications for digital mental health resources. International Journal of Social Media Research, 8(4), 212-226.
  6. Fox, S., & Moreland, J. (2015). Social media and mental health: Examining the impact of user engagement on well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 410-415.
  7. Frattaroli, J., et al. (2014). The role of emotional support in online mental health communities. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(6), 502-517.
  8. Johnson, A., Patel, N., & Lee, T. (2021). Personalized content recommendations and user satisfaction in digital mental health interventions. Digital Health, 7(3), 230-240.
  9. Johnson, C., Nguyen, T., & Lin, Y. (2021). Personalized Digital Interventions: A Review of Current Research and Future Directions. Digital Health Review, 12(4), 225-239.
  10. Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2020). Gender differences in perceptions of mental health resources: The impact of content type on perceived usefulness. Journal of Digital Health, 5(1), 45-59.
  11. Kumar, R., Patel, S., & Lee, H. (2023). Misinformation and algorithmic amplification on social media: Risks for mental health. Social Media and Mental Health Review, 9(3), 134-146.
  12. Kumar, R., Singh, A., & Patel, S. (2023). Algorithm-driven content and its impact on mental health information accuracy: A case study of TikTok. Journal of Social Media Studies, 19(1), 56-71.
  13. Kumar, V., Patel, R., & Nguyen, D. (2023). Misinformation in Digital Mental Health Platforms: Risks and Mitigation Strategies. Health Informatics Journal, 29(2), 140-155.
  14. Kumar, V., Patel, R., & Nguyen, D. (2023). Misinformation in Digital Mental Health Platforms: Risks and Mitigation Strategies. Health Informatics Journal, 29(2), 140-155.
  15. Lee, J., & Choi, M. (2021). Gender differences in engagement with mental health content on social media: A case study of TikTok. International Journal of Social Media and Mental Health, 11(1), 45-59.
  16. Lee, S., & Choi, H. (2021). The Role of Social Media in Mental Health Support: A Study of TikTok. Journal of Social Media and Mental Health, 10(3), 210-225.
  17. Maass, A., Bernieri, F., & Schubert, T. (2018). Gender differences in content preferences: Implications for digital mental health content. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(5), 545-560.
  18. Marques, S., Sanchez, J., & Lee, M. (2020). The role of social media in mental health support: A review of platforms and their impact. Digital Mental Health Journal, 8(2), 56-70.
  19. Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Marsch, L. A., & Bartels, S. J. (2016). The future of mental health care: Peer-to-peer support and social media. General Hospital Psychiatry, 39, 48-50.
  20. Seabrook, E. M., Kern, M. L., & Rickard, N. S. (2016). Social networking sites as a tool for mental health promotion: A review of the literature. Journal of Mental Health, 25(3), 239-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5842
  21. Smith, J., Brown, T., & Green, A. (2022). Algorithmic Influence on Mental Health Content: The Case of TikTok. International Journal of Social Media Research, 7(1), 76-89.
  22. Smith, T., Johnson, L., & Ahmed, N. (2021). Gender differences in engagement with digital mental health resources: Implications for content development. Social Media and Mental Health Review, 10(2), 87-102.
  23. Smith, T., Johnson, L., & Ahmed, N. (2021). Gender differences in engagement with digital mental health resources: Implications for content development. Social Media and Mental Health Review, 10(2), 87-102.
  24. Smith, T., Johnson, L., & Ahmed, N. (2022). The impact of algorithm-driven content on mental health information quality. Journal of Media Psychology, 19(4), 210-225.
  25. Swann, W. B., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (2018). Authenticity and the Pursuit of Self: How Gender Differences Shape Mental Health Support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 753-765.
  26. Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: The role of algorithms in shaping online experiences. Understanding Media and Society, 10(1), 1-15.
  27. Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic Harms Beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(1), 203-233.
  28. Wright, K. B., et al. (2019). Gender differences in online mental health resource usage and effectiveness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(4), 243-251.