Exploring The Relationship Between Bullying, Academic Achievement And Social Behavior Among University Students

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ayesha Tariq
Dr. Shammem Akhtar

Abstract

The current study aims to explore the relationship between Bullying, Academic Achievement and Social Behavior among University Students. These variables are essential in the modern era due to their impact on students' well-being and academic success. The sample size for the study was calculated by G power formula and 250 university students (121 men and 129 women) aged 18-25 from various universities in Faisalabad was selected using a convenient sampling technique. The variables were measured using the Bullying Questionnaire (Gall Dore, 2015), Academic Performance Scale (McGregory et al., 2015) and Social Behavior Questionnaire (Ledley et al., 1997).  A correlational research design was employed, and data was analyzed using SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and t-tests were used to evaluate the hypotheses. The results indicated that bullying is positively and significantly related to academic achievement, while bullying positively associate with social behavior. These findings suggest that positive significant relationship between bullying is associated with academic achievement and social behavior among university students. No significant gender differences were found in terms of bullying, academic achievement or social behavior. The study highlights the importance of addressing bullying to improve academic performance and social behavior among university students. In conclusion, the present research study creates awareness among researchers, educational psychologists, and parents that excessive about bullying may effect on academic achievement and social behavior among university students.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Tariq, A. and Akhtar, S. 2024. Exploring The Relationship Between Bullying, Academic Achievement And Social Behavior Among University Students. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 2 (Jun. 2024), 639–643. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00279.

References

  1. Akhtar, S., Sarwar, R., & Zulifqar, Y. (2023). Maternal expressed emotions; navigating the pathways of adolescent emotional well-being and resilience. Russian Law Journal, 11(11s). 628-633.
  2. Castelfranchi, C. (1998). Modelling social action for AI agents. Artificial Intelligence, 103(3), 157-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00056-3
  3. Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2003). Identifying and targeting risk for involvement in bullying and victimization. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(9) 577-582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370304800903
  4. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x
  5. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
  6. Farrington, D. F. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and Justice, 17(3), 381–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/449217
  7. Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2015). Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 123(4), 1059–1065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1215
  8. Health, W. (2018). Psychology Research Methods. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Lee, C. (2004). Preventing bullying in schools: A guide for teachers and other professionals. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 14 (1), 1-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215807
  10. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala.
  11. Monks, C., & Smith, P. K. (2006). Definitions of “bullying”: Age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 801–821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X82352
  12. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  13. Olweus, D. (1996). Bullying at school: Knowledge base and an effective intervention program. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 794(5), 265–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb32527.x
  14. Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 7–27). London: Routledge.
  15. Rigby, K. (1998). Peer relations at school and the health of adolescents. Youth Studies Australia, 17(1), 13–17.
  16. Rigby, K. (2002). New perspectives on bullying. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  17. Salmivalli, C. (1996). Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychology, health & medicine, 22(1), 240-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740
  18. Sharp, S. (1995). How much does bullying hurt? The effects of bullying on the personal wellbeing and educational progress of secondary aged students. Educational and Child Psychology, 12(3), 81–88.
  19. Smith, P. K. (1997). Bullying in life-span perspective: What can studies of school bullying and workplace bullying learn from each other? Journal of Community Applied Social Psychology, 7(3), 249-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199706)7:3<249::AID-CASP425>3.3.CO;2-U
  20. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 435−450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/026151099165384
  21. Young-Jones, A., Fursa, S., Byrket, J. S., & Sly, J. S. (2015). Bullying affects more than feelings: The long-term implications of victimization on academic motivation in higher education. Social psychology of education, 18(1), 185-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9287-1