Exploring Rhotacism in English Spoken by Urdu Speakers in Pakistan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00292
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ayesha Shakeel
MPhil Scholar, DLC,UMT Sialkot, Pakistan
Dr. Ali Hussain Bin Sadiq
Assistant Professor, DLC, UMT Sialkot, Pakistan

Abstract

This study examines the Rhotacismof the /r/ sound among native Urdu speakers learning English, focusing on minimal pairs and medial contexts. The aim is to understand phonological transfer and improve language teaching and therapy techniques. The study analyzed formant frequencies and durations of /r/ sounds produced by early learners (exposed to English before age 10) and late learners (exposed after age 10) using a purposive sample of 20 participants. Grounded in the Critical Period Hypothesis and the Speech Learning Model (SLM), which together suggest that early language exposure leads to more native-like pronunciation and that L1 phonetic characteristics influence L2 acquisition. The findings reveal that early learners exhibit clearer formant frequencies and shorter durations, effectively distinguishing the /r/ sound from others. In contrast, late learners demonstrate overlapping frequencies and longer durations, influenced by the retroflex /r/ in Urdu. The discussion underscores the impact of L1 phonology on L2 pronunciation and the necessity for targeted pronunciation exercises and speech therapy interventions. The study concludes that early exposure to English significantly enhances phonological proficiency. However, limitations such as the small sample size and the focus on specific phonetic contexts suggest the need for further research with larger samples and diverse contexts to validate these findings and explore additional phonological features influencing L2 acquisition.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Shakeel, A. and Bin Sadiq, A.H. 2024. Exploring Rhotacism in English Spoken by Urdu Speakers in Pakistan. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 2 (Jun. 2024), 734–741. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00292.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ali, M., & Mahmood, A. (2021). The role of technology in enhancing English pronunciation skills among Pakistani learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 235-250.
  2. Ashraf, H., & Qureshi, I. (2019). Phonetic training in Pakistani schools: Impact on English pronunciation skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3), 123-136.
  3. Baumgardner, R. J. (1993). The English language in Pakistan. Oxford University Press.
  4. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege(pp. 13-34). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
  5. Cruttenden, A. (2014).Gimson’s pronunciation of English (8th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203784969
  6. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486
  7. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research(pp. 233-277). York Press.
  8. Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). The significance of pronunciation in English language teaching. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 96-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n4p96
  9. Khan, A., & Rasheed, S. (2020). Investigating phonetic challenges in Pakistani learners of English: A focus on rhotacism. Pakistan Journal of Linguistics, 12(1), 45-58.
  10. Khan, A., & Rasheed, S. (2016). Speech-language pathology in Pakistan: Current status and future directions. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(5), 1237-1241.
  11. Khan, R., Ali, Z., & Begum, T. (2019). Advances in speech therapy practices for addressing rhotacism in Pakistan. Journal of Speech Therapy, 8(2), 89-101.
  12. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language.Wiley Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
  13. Mahboob, A. (2004). Pakistani English: Phonology. In B. Kortmann& E. W. Schneider (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English(pp. 1003-1015). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197181-065
  14. Mahboob, A., &Ahmar, N. (2008). An acoustic description of Pakistani English liquids. World Englishes, 27(3-4), 502-515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00581.x
  15. Munro, M. J., &Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners.Language Learning, 45(1), 73-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x
  16. Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802447651
  17. Rahman, T. (2002). Language, ideology, and power: Language-learning among the Muslims of Pakistan and North India. Oxford University Press.
  18. Shah, S. R., &Pathan, H. (2016). Factors affecting the teaching and learning of English as a second language: A case study of Pakistan. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 94-100.
  19. Shah, S. R., &Pathan, H. (2016). The influence of L1 phonological and orthographic system on L2 pronunciation and orthography. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 4(8), 58-65.