Critical Discourse Analysis of Discursive Strategies Employed in Unga Speeches of Imran Khan: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00212
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Zafran Saeed
M.Phil., English Linguistics Scholar, Department of English, Kohat University of Science and Technology, KP, Pakistan
Dr. Said Imran
Assistant Professor, Department of English, Kohat University of Science and Technology, KP, Pakistan
Dr. Syed Sabih ul Hassan
Assistant Professor, Department of English, Kohat University of Science and Technology, KP, Pakistan

Abstract

Language is a powerful tool used by socio-political actors to persuade and win support. This study investigated how Pakistani political leaders use language to gain support from other countries' leaders and the general public. Specifically, it analyzed Imran Khan's speeches at the United Nations General Assembly to identify linguistic and discursive strategies that revealed ideological perspectives. Using a qualitative approach, the study collected speeches from Google and the UNGA's website via purposive sampling and analyzed them using Textual Analysis and Teun A. van Dijk's (2005) Model. The findings shows that Khan employed various devices, including topicalization, polarization, lexicalization, populism, metaphor, and the dichotomy of positive self-representation and negative other-representation. These strategies served to promote Pakistan's perspective, advocate peace, and counter Islamophobia. This research highlights the role of language in shaping socio-political realities and suggests further comparative research on world leaders' speeches at the UNGA to explore universal and culturally specific rhetorical strategies in global diplomacy.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Saeed, Z., Imran, D.S. and Sabih ul Hassan, D.S. 2024. Critical Discourse Analysis of Discursive Strategies Employed in Unga Speeches of Imran Khan: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 2 (Jun. 2024), 107–115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00212.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ali, A., Gul, N., & Sabih-Ul-Hassan, S. (2022). An investigation into the reading comprehension problems faced by the Pakistani students at university level. City University Research Journal Of Literature And Linguistics, 5(1), 134-148.
  2. Afaq, M., Sabih-ul-Hassan, S., & Gul, N. (2022). A Linguistic Critique on Naturalism in Thomas Hardy's Novel'The Mayor of Casterbridge'. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 3(2), 143-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.20223210
  3. Afaq, M., Shah, M., & Gul, N. (2023). The Role of Henchard’s Character in Loss and Profit of His Business in the Novel the Mayor of Casterbridge. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(2), 318-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-II)27
  4. Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Erdogan’s political speech. Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, 7, 23-40.
  5. Bello, U. (2013). “If I could make it, you too can make it!” Personal pronouns in political discourse: a CDA of President Jonathan’s presidential declaration speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3 (6), 84-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v3n6p84
  6. Blommaert, J., & Bulaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  8. Dunmire, P. L. (2012). Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language of politics and the politics of language. Language and Linguistics compass, 6(11), 735-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365
  9. Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. How to analyze talk in institutional settings: A Casebook of methods, 25-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933927.ch-003
  10. Fenton-Smith, B. (2007). Diplomatic condolences: ideological positioning in the death of Yasser Arafat. Discourse & Society, 18(6), 697-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507082192
  11. Gruber, H. (2015). Intertextual references in Austrian parliamentary debates. Follow-ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across contexts and discourse domains, 60, 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.60.02gru
  12. Gul, N., Sabih-Ul-Hassan, S., & Imran, S. (2022(a)). An Exploration of the Factors Responsible For English Language Oral Fluency Problems Faced By the Undergraduate Level Students in District Kohat. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 3(2), 95-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.20223205
  13. Gul, N., Ali, M., & Sabih-Ul-Hassan, S. (2022(b)). An Investigation Into The Challenges Faced By The Secondary Level Students In Speaking English In District Kohat Kpk Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(2), 1018-1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v4i2.596
  14. Gul, N., Khatoon, S., & Hassan, S. S. U. (2022(c)). An Investigation into the Role of Language in Regional Connectivity in Afghanistan and Pakistan. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6(I), 341-348.
  15. Gul, N., Wasti, A. T., & Hassan, S. S. U. (2023(a)). The Implications of Anxiety/Uncertainty Management Theory in Pakistani Context: A Critique from the Perspective of Sociolinguistics. City University Research Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 6(1), 144-163.
  16. Ishtiaq, M., Gul, N., & Khan, Y. (2022). English to Urdu Transliteration AS A Major Cause of Pronunciation Error in L1 & L2 Urdu Speakers of English: A Pedagogical Perspective. Global Language Review, VII, 282-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2022(VII-II).24
  17. Khan, A. A., Khan, I. A., & Gul, N. (2023) (a) Exploring Personal and Ethnic Identity in Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00119
  18. Khan, A. A., Khan, I. A., & Gul, N. (2023)(b) Exploring Stylistic Elements in Daud Kamal’s Poem Plough & Oxen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00154
  19. Gul, N., Imran, S., & Wasti, A. T. (2023(b)). A Study of the Bidirectional Causality Relationship Between English Language and Environment: Looking Through the Lens of Ecological Discourse Analysis (EDA). Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(4), 114-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-IV)11
  20. Gul, N., Sabih-Ul-Hassan, S., & Imran, S. (2022(d)). A linguistic analysis of the impact of Covid-19 on English language diction in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(2), 1010-1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v4i2.553
  21. Nasir, S., Gul, N., & Ullah, A. (2023). Existential Elements in the Character of the Underground Man. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(2), 185-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-II)16
  22. Gul, N., Ali, A., Hassan, S. S. U., & Rasheed, A. (2023)(c) An Investigation into the Politics of English Language Assessment in Pakistan. Journal of Policy Research, 9(4), 84-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00130
  23. Gul, N., Farooq, A., & Ali, A. (2022(d)). Saussure’s Concept of Binary Oppositions: Looking through the Lens of the Holy Qur’an. Al-Azhār, 8(01), 111-119.
  24. Hanauer, D. I. (2011). The discursive construction of the separation wall at Abu Dis: Graffiti as political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(3), 301-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han
  25. Iqbal, A. (2015). Discourse Analysis of Prominent Politicians‟ Public Speeches. Linguistics and Literature Review, 1(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/llr/11/01
  26. Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  27. Jones, J., & Peccei, J. S. (2004). ‘Language and politics’. In Thomas, L. (Ed), Language, Society, and Power. New York: Routledge.
  28. Jones, W. J. (2014). Political semiotics of national campaign posters and pictorial representation: Thailand's 2011 general elections. Semiotica, (199), 269-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0128
  29. Kreis, R. (2017). The “tweet politics” of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 607-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
  30. Mason, O., & Platt, R. (2006). ‘Embracing A New Creed: Lexical Patterning and The Encoding of ideology’. College Literature 33(2), 154-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2006.0022
  31. Matić, D. (2012). Ideological discourse structure in political speeches. Communication and Culture Online, Year III, Issue 3, 54–78.
  32. Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches of CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, Sage, 14–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n2
  33. Pearson, B. A., & Lee, K. S. (1992). Discourse structure of direction giving: Effects of native/nonnative speaker status and gender. Tesol Quarterly, 26(1), 113-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587371
  34. Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2012). Community relations in Belgium: Political and linguistic approaches. Community relations in Belgium, 1-281.
  35. Post, M. D. (2009). Representations of meaning within textual personas: An analysis of 2008 US presidential campaign speeches. University of Birmingham.
  36. Rashidi, N., & Souzandehfar, M. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of the debates between republicans and democrats over the continuation of war in Iraq. The Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education, 3-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2010.3.4
  37. Rudyk, I. (2007). Power relations in President Bush’s state of the Union Speech. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 23, 68-76.
  38. Sabih-Ul-Hassan, S., Gul, N., & Imran, S. (2023) Factors Responsible for Wrong Pronunciation of English Words by Students at Undergraduate Level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(1), 70-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.20234106
  39. Sajjad, U., Hassan, S. S. U., & Gul, N. (2023). Academic Words in Discourse News: A Corpus Based Study Of Pakistani English Newspaper. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(2), 515-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-II)46
  40. Sadeghi, B., & Tabatabai, M. S. (2015). Metaphor Analysis and Discursive Cycle of Iran's Foreign Policy: “Justice” through the lenses of US-IRAN Presidents. Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science Journal (CSJ), 36 (3), 2338-2358.
  41. Sardabi, N., Biria, R., & Azin, N. (2014). Rouhan’s UN speech: A change in ideology or strategy. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 7 (3), 84-97.
  42. Sharififar, M., & Rahimi, E. (2015). Critical discourse analysis of political Speeches: A case study of Obama's and Rouhani's speeches at UN. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(2), 343-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0502.14
  43. Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideology, and Point of View. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312612
  44. Strauss, S., & Feiz, P. (2014). Discourse analysis; Putting Our Worlds into worlds (1st Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  45. Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideologies, racism, discourse: Debates on immigration and ethnic issues. Comparative perspectives on racism, 91-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315196374-5
  46. Van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis Language & peace: Routledge, 41-58.
  47. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17 (3), 359-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
  48. Wiggins, S. (2009). Discourse analysis. In Encyclopedia of Human Relationships. California: Sage Publications, 427-430.
  49. Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about-A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments, in methods of Critical Analysis. In Ruth Wodak and Micheal Meyer (Ed), SAGE Publications, India Pvt Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n1
  50. Wodak, R., & Boukala, S. (2015). European identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union: A discourse historical approach. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(1), 87-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod
  51. Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2001). The Semiotics of Racism. Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
  52. Zirak Ghazani, A. (2016). Critical Analysis of President Rouhani‟s Discourse at UN General Assembly. Iranian Journal of Language Issues, 2(1).

Most read articles by the same author(s)