Bridging Theory and Practice: Action Research as a Catalyst for Educational Reform in Pakistan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00253
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr. Yaar Muhammad
Associate Professor, Department of Education, GC Women University, Sialkot
Dr. Samina Safdar
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, University of Education, Bank Road Campus, Lahore
Sajida Saif
PhD Scholar, Department of Education, University of Management and Technology, Lahore

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the critical role of action research in realizing educational reform within Pakistan. It posits that the gap between educational theory and classroom practice has historically hindered significant improvements in Pakistan’s education system. This makes action research and its process comprising of planning, acting, and reflecting cycle an excellent method to meet these two opposite ends. Action research is a highly formative exercise; it calls for empowering educators as researchers in their classrooms, building an organizational culture tuned to inquiry and evidence-based decision-making. This paper reviews an approach that can meet the unique educational challenges of Pakistan that arise due to complex socio-economic contexts, multilingual classrooms, and resource constraints. We illustrate case studies and review the literature to indicate how action research has supported teaching innovation, improved student learning outcomes, and created greater policy ownership. The review argues for the potential of action research in Pakistan and how it can be beneficial as a tool that fosters reflection among practitioners and as a source enriching teacher professional development and thereby triggering broader educational change. The paper concludes with suggestions of how action research might be integrated into teacher education and school improvement initiatives.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Muhammad, Y. , Safdar, S. and Saif, S. 2024. Bridging Theory and Practice: Action Research as a Catalyst for Educational Reform in Pakistan. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 2 (Jun. 2024), 435–446. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00253.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. ASER Pakistan. (2014). Annual status of education report (ASER) Pakistan 2019. ASER Pakistan.
  2. Ashraf, D., & Rarieya, J. F. A. (2008). Teacher development through reflective conversations—Possibilities and tensions: A Pakistan case. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 269–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802207055
  3. Aw, Y. C., Muhammad, G., & Rahman, A. U. (2021). Educational challenges in Pakistan: Facts or falsity. Journal of Social Sciences Review. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.2021.1.1.57 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v1i1.12
  4. Bao, K. (2024). Qualitative and quantitative approaches. In Applied Linguistics and Language Education Research Methods: Fundamentals and Innovations (pp. 29–40). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2603-9.ch003
  5. Bashiruddin, A. (2011). My story, my identity: Doctoral students’ experiences of learning English in a multilingual context. Lambert Academic Publishing.
  6. Brinkmann, S. (2023). Qualitative interviewing: Conversational knowledge through research interviews (2nd ed.). Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197648186.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197648186.001.0001
  7. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in english language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  9. Durrani, N., Halai, A., Kadiwal, L., Rajput, S. K., & Novelli, M. (2017). Education and social cohesion in Pakistan: Summary report Pakistan. University of Sussex. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316104762_Education_and_Social_Cohesion_in_Pakistan
  10. Eilertsen, T.-V., Gustafson, N., & Salo, P. (2008). Action research and the micropolitics in schools. Educational Action Research, 16(3), 295–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802260208
  11. Halai, A. (2011). Equality or equity: Gender awareness issues in secondary schools in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(1), 44–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.06.012
  12. Halai, A., & Durrani, N. (2018). Teachers as agents of peace? Exploring teacher agency in social cohesion in Pakistan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(4), 535–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1322491
  13. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
  14. Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
  15. Madampage, A. I. (2023). Educational system in Pakistan and its challenges. International Journal of Culture and Education, 1(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.59600/ijcae.v1i1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59600/ijcae.v1i1.4
  16. Manan, S. A., David, M. K., & Dumanig, F. P. (2017). Language management: A snapshot of governmentality within the private schools in Quetta, Pakistan. Language Policy, 16(4), 463–485.
  17. McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112755
  18. Mertler, C. A. (2019). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators. Sage Publications.
  19. Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training. (2024). Pakistan Education Statistics 2021-22. Government of Pakistan.
  20. Muijs, D. (2022). Doing quantitative research in education with IBM SPSS statistics. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with IBM SPSS Statistics, 1–100.
  21. Naseer, H., Muhammad, Y., & Masood, S. (2020). Developing reflective practices of elementary school teachers: A collaborative action research study. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 1(4), 22–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss4-2020(22-33)
  22. Nasir, M., Iqbal, R., & Majeed, M. T. (2019). Socio-economic determinants of child labor and school attendance: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(7), 880–897.
  23. Nawab, A. (2023). Using action research to initiate school-based teacher development activities: Insights from Northern Sindh, Pakistan. Educational Action Research, 31(2), 285–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1898430
  24. Rahman, T. (2010). Language policy, multilingualism and language vitality in Pakistan. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 213, 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197785.1.73
  25. Rashid, K., & Mukhtar, S. (2012). Education in Pakistan: Problems and their solutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(11), 332.
  26. Shamim, F., & Qureshi, R. (2013). Informed consent in educational research in the South: Tensions and accommodations. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(4), 464–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.797729
  27. Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  28. Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley.
  29. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989
  30. Zakar, M. Z., Qureshi, S., Zakar, R., Aqil, N., & Manawar, R. (2018). Universal primary education in Pakistan: Constraints and challenges. South Asian Studies, 33(2), 14.