The Role of Community-Based Organizations in Promoting Inclusive Education Practices Outside the Formal School System

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr. Sumera Rashid
Dr. Faisal Anis
Mariam Iqbal
Dr. Yaar Muhammad

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the involvement of Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) in support of inclusion programs outside the traditional schooling context. In this paper, CBOs' approaches to redress educational imbalances and facilitate the education of the disenfranchised are showcased through successful case studies in various global contexts. The findings stress the role of CBOs as effective local performers in the identification of educational needs, the function of intermediary agents between the formal educational systems and the local communities and environment, and the development of inclusive learning processes. We discuss the use of non-formal education programs by CBOs as well as advocacy, social mobilization, and partnerships with schools and policymakers. The paper also describes the issues encountered by CBOs in supporting and promoting the principles of inclusive education, as well as potential measures for improvement. This paper also shows the importance of CBOs in attaining educational equity and inclusion since it also presents different models for demonstration. The insights, therefore, extend the definition of inclusive education beyond school-based provision and will provide information for policy, teachers, and other stakeholders who are interested in providing opportunities for learning to everyone.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Rashid, S. , Anis, F. , Iqbal, M. and Muhammad, Y. 2024. The Role of Community-Based Organizations in Promoting Inclusive Education Practices Outside the Formal School System. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 3 (Sep. 2024), 123–129. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00327.

References

  1. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
  2. Ainscow, M., Slee, R., & Best, M. (2019). Inclusion and equity in education: Making sense of global challenges. Prospects, 49(3), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-019-09444-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09506-w
  3. Benson, C. (2018). Multilingual education for all: Applying an integrated multilingual curriculum model to low-income contexts. In In Language Issues in Comparative Education (pp. 101–118). Sense Publishers.
  4. Bhola, H. S. (2006). Adult and Lifelong Education for Poverty Reduction: A Critical Analysis of Contexts and Conditions. International Review of Education, 52(3–4), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-006-0006-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-006-0006-9
  5. Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2014). Regulating private tutoring for public good: Policy options for supplementary education in Asia. Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
  6. Crenshaw, K. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. The New Press.
  7. Edwards, D. B., & Klees, S. J. (2015). Unpacking “participation” in development and education governance: A framework of perspectives and practices. PROSPECTS, 45(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-015-9367-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-015-9367-9
  8. Epstein, J. L. (2023). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400780-2
  9. Ewing, R. (2011). The arts and Australian education: Realising potential. Australian Council for Educational Research.
  10. Hoppers, W. (2006). Non-formal education and basic education reform: A conceptual review. International Institute for Educational Planning.
  11. Mundy, K., & Murphy, L. (2001). Transnational Advocacy, Global Civil Society? Emerging Evidence from the Field of Education. Comparative Education Review, 45(1), 85–126. https://doi.org/10.1086/447646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/447646
  12. Nishimura, M. (2017). Community participation in school management in developing countries. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.64
  13. Rogers, A. (2014). The base of the iceberg: Informal learning and its impact on formal and non-formal learning. Barbara Budrich Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/84740632
  14. Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
  15. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054578
  16. Singal, N. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in efforts towards inclusive education: Reflections from india. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7–8), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1624845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1624845
  17. Sperling, G. B., & Winthrop, R. (2016). What works in girls’ education: Evidence for the world’s best investment. Brookings Institution Press.
  18. Tripney, J., Newman, M., Hovish, K., & Brown, C. (2012). Protocol: Post-basic technical and vocational education and training (TVET) interventions to improve employability and employment of TVET graduates in low-and middle-income countries. https://doi.org/10.1002/CL2.93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/CL2.93
  19. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989
  20. Unterhalter, E. (2019). The many meanings of quality education: Politics of targets and indicators in sdg 4. Global Policy, 10, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12591