Investigates WTO Legislation: Its Variety and Complexity

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00254
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Naheeda Ali
Assistant Professor, Department of Law, University of the Punjab, Gujranwala Campus. Pakistan

Abstract

This study analyses the core principles, rules, and organizational structure of the World Trade Organisation that make up the complex field of WTO jurisprudence. Furthermore, it delves into the complex and specialized aspects of WTO law, providing lucid explanations on several subjects related to the intersection between international commerce and legal doctrines. The underlying concepts of fair trade and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) are given special importance, focusing on legal pluralism and non-discrimination issues. By thoroughly analyzing the many aspects of WTO law, this article significantly enhances our understanding of international trade regulation, trade change, and existing clearances.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Ali, N. 2024. Investigates WTO Legislation: Its Variety and Complexity. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 2 (Jun. 2024), 447–452. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00254.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Baena-Rojas, J. J., Cardona-Montoya, G., & Herrero-Olarte, S. (2023). International trade agreements within the GATT-WTO paradigm: a descriptive study based on sociological reflection approach. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 46(1), 269-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcs.v46n1.92435
  2. Baetens, F. (2023). World trade Organization rules before Investment Tribunals: Facilitating cross-fertilisation while appreciating particularities. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 24(1), 1-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340277
  3. Bi, Y. (2024). Experimentation at the WTO lab: towards a better ‘Interface’to accommodate State-owned enterprises. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, idae004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idae004
  4. Carmody, C. (2024). Procedural aspects of WTO dispute settlement. In Research Handbook on International Procedural Law (pp. 122-155). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970792.00018
  5. Czapnik, B. (2024). Consistency testing in WTO law and the special case of moral regulation. European Journal of International Law, 35(1), 175-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae003
  6. den Bossche, V., & Henri, P. L. (2023). Can the WTO Dispute Settlement System Be Revived? Options for Addressing a Major Governance Failure of the World Trade Organization. HEC conference book. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004693722_013
  7. Drabek, Z. (2024). Is the WTO terminally ill? Threats to the international trading system. Asia and the Global Economy, 4(1), 100078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2024.100078
  8. Du, T., & Ye, Z. (2023). Trade Control and WTO Law: Examining the Adequacy of the GATT Exception. In A Chinese Perspective on WTO Reform (pp. 171-191). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8230-9_7
  9. Duong, V. H. (2023). Natural resource underpricing in WTO subsidies rules and beyond: a reflection of north-south divide in globalization. Lex Portus, 9, 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.9.2.2023.3
  10. Duong, V. H. (2023). Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body in Natural Resource Subsidy Disputes: Fixing a Loophole or Kicking off a Debate. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 20(3).
  11. Elsässer, J. P., Hickmann, T., Jinnah, S., Oberthür, S., & Van de Graaf, T. (2022). Institutional interplay in global environmental governance: lessons learned and future research. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 22(2), 373-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-022-09569-4
  12. Hoekman, B., & Wolfe, R. (2023). The Geneva effect: where officials sit influences where they stand on WTO priorities. Review of International Political Economy, 30(6), 2382-2405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2154244
  13. Hofmann, S. C., & Yeo, A. (2024). Historical institutionalism and institutional design: divergent pathways to regime complexes in Asia and Europe. European journal of international relations, 30(2), 306-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661231170717
  14. Ilic, P. S. (2023). Procedural general principles of law in international trade and investment law: comparison of enforcement perspective.
  15. Krisch, N. (2022). Entangled legalities in the postnational space. International journal of constitutional law, 20(1), 476-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac018
  16. Miranda, J., & Sánchez Miranda, M. (2023). Chronicle of a crisis foretold: how the WTO Appellate Body drove itself into a corner. Journal of International Economic Law, 26(3), 435-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgad023
  17. Mitchell, A. D. (2023). The right to regulate and the interpretation of the WTO Agreement. Journal of International Economic Law, 26(3), 462-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgad024
  18. Ortino, F. (2024). International Trade Law and Sustainable Development: A Complex and Evolving Relationship. In International Business Contracts and Sustainability. Pacini Giuridica.
  19. Prévost, D. (2023). Disciplining Health Regulations through the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Science and the Rule of Law. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.84
  20. Segate, R. V. (2024). Precedential value of judicial decisions in increasingly hybridised civil law systems: Chinese choreographies at the WTO. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 19(1), 107-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2023.38
  21. Sterken, S., & Pohl, D. (2023). The Architecture of Global Governance: Paths of Approach. Architectural Theory Review, 27(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2023.2241238
  22. Van Vaerenbergh, P. (2023). WTO Rules for Greening Trade Remedies. In Greening Trade Remedies: Environmental Considerations in the Law and Practice of WTO Trade Remedies (pp. 25-48). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38172-0_3