Objectification and Confinement of Female Sexuality in Austen’s Emma and its Literary Adaptation: A Postfeminist Comparative Analysis

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ishvah Khan
Dr Bushra Siddiqui

Abstract

This research explores the construction of female sexuality in the literary adaptation Emma (2020) directed by Autumn de Wilde through a postfeminist lens. The research is based on Iris Marion Young’s theory of oppression examining the feminine body comportment and mobility. The movement and ability of females to perform household and outdoor chores is restricted by the male gender. The restriction on the sexuality of a woman develops a fragile and dependent self. The female characters of Emma (1815) reveal the oppressive structures that confine feminine activities under the definition of morality and grace. The categorization of female qualities develops a gendered discourse that encourages a binary classification of sex as male and female. The division between sex is further strengthened by the association of female sexuality with material objects. The material objects re-enforce and encourage objectification and confinement of female sexuality. The literary adaptation highlights the negative social implications of material objects on the portrayal of female characters.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Khan, I. and Siddiqui, B. 2024. Objectification and Confinement of Female Sexuality in Austen’s Emma and its Literary Adaptation: A Postfeminist Comparative Analysis. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 2 (Jun. 2024), 666–673. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00283.

References

  1. Cixous, H., Cohen, K., & Cohen, P. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 1(4), 875-893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/493306
  2. Cresswell, T. (1999). Embodiment, power and the politics of mobility: the case of female tramps and hobos. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 24(2), 175-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00175.x
  3. James, R. (2017). “Literature Acknowledges No Boundaries”: Book reading and social class in Britain, c. 1930–c. 1945. Journal of Social History, 51(1), 80-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shw086
  4. Khan, A. (1999). Mobility of women and access to health and family planning services in Pakistan. Reproductive health matters, 7(14), 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90005-8
  5. Kinney, Michael. "A Review of Linda Hutcheon's A Theory of Adaptation." Critical Voices: The University of Guelph Book Review Project 3, no. 3 (2013): 7-15.
  6. Kramp, Michael. "The woman, the gypsies, and England: Harriet Smith's national role." College Literature (2004): 147-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2004.0008
  7. Meling, L. K. (2019). ‘The Lady at the Piano’; From Innocent Pastime to Intimate Discourse. Music & Practice, 5(3) 1–18.
  8. Shiva, V. (2009). Women and the gendered politics of food. Philosophical Topics, 37(2), 17-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20093722
  9. Vorachek, L. (2000). " THE INSTRUMENT OF THE CENTURY": THE PIANO AS AN ICON OF FEMALE SEXUALITY IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY. George Eliot-George Henry Lewes Studies, (38/39), 26-43.
  10. Warhol, R. R. (1992, October). The Look, the Body, and the Heroine: A Feminist-Narratological Reading of" Persuasion". In Novel: A Forum on Fiction (Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 5-19). Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1345602
  11. Yoshimi, Jeff, et al. Horizons of Phenomenology: Essays on the State of the Field and Its Applications. Springer Nature, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26074-2
  12. Young, I. M. (1980). Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment motility and spatiality. Human studies, 3(1), 137-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331805
  13. Zerilli, L. M. (1992). A process without a subject: Simone de Beauvoir and Julia Kristeva on maternity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 18(1), 111-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/494781