Gender Fluidity and Subversion of Socio-Cultural Power Structures in Eugenides’ Middlesex: Exploring Performativity

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00334
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ghamza Arshad
MPhil Scholar, Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Management and Technology, Lahore
Dr. Bushra Siddiqui
Assistant Professor, Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Management and Technology, Lahore

Abstract

The aim of the research is to explore Eugenides’ Middlesex through the lens of Butler’s concept of performativity that focuses on gender fluidity and identity formation through the socio-cultural repeated acts. The theory of performativity investigates Butler’s idea that gender norms are constructed and sustained within the society. The theoretical application of performativity on Middlesex explores the challenges related to the conventional understanding of gender by analysing the characters as fluid-gendered identities. The research explores the ability of performative acts to both strengthen and subvert the dominant power structures by examining how the protagonist navigates and breaches socio-cultural norms, emphasizing the possibility for fundamental cultural change and resistance. The methodology used in the research is qualitative approach that focuses on the thematic analysis. The purpose of the research is to examine the subversion of gender stereotypes in Middlesex. The significance of the research is to investigate the formation of fluid-gendered identities which are regarded as unnatural entities by conventional wisdom.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Arshad, G. and Siddiqui, B. 2024. Gender Fluidity and Subversion of Socio-Cultural Power Structures in Eugenides’ Middlesex: Exploring Performativity. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 3 (Sep. 2024), 179–187. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00334.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Al-Utoom, M. (2016). The second sex: An analytical study of Simone de Beauvoir's influence on Arab feminism. European Journal of Social Sciences, 52(1).
  2. Athanassakis, Y. (n.d.). "The American girl I had once been": Psychosomatic trauma and history in Jeffrey Eugenides' Middlesex. European Journal of American Culture.
  3. Beauvoir, S. de. (2010). The second sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.; J. Thurman, Introduction). Vintage ebooks. https://uberty.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/1949_simone-de-beauvoir-the-second-sex.pdf (Original work published 1949)
  4. Delphy, C. (1993). Rethinking sex and gender. Women’s Studies International Forum, 16(1), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(93)90076-L
  5. Eugenides, J. (2013). Middlesex. Fourth Estate.
  6. Forsyth, S. B. (2023, July 24). On Judith Butler and Gender Trouble. Medium. https://medium.com/
  7. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.).
  8. Goffman, I. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.
  9. He, L. (2017). The construction of gender: Judith Butler and gender performativity. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 124, 682-685. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.166
  10. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art (T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez, Trans.; L. S. Roudiez, Ed.). Columbia University Press.
  11. Lynch, A. (2009). Hegemonic masculinity. In J. O’Brien (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender and society (Vol. 1, pp. 411-413). Sage.
  12. Mohajan, H. (2022). An overview on the feminism and its categories. Research and Advances in Education, 1(3), 11-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2022.09.02
  13. Mulvey, L. (1999). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In L. Braudy & M. Cohen (Eds.), Film theory and criticism: Introductory readings (pp. 833-844). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474473224-009
  14. Pishkar, K. (2022). Jeffrey Eugenides' Middlesex: A modern self-quest in light of Lacanian perspective on Calliope Helen (Master's thesis).
  15. Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4
  16. Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053-1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1864376
  17. Sedgwick, E. (1993). Tendencies. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381860
  18. Trendel, A. (2011). The reinvention of identity in Jeffrey Eugenides’s Middlesex. European Journal of American Studies, 6(2), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.9036
  19. Wedgwood, N. (2009). Connell's theory of masculinity - Its origins and influences on the study of gender. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230903260001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230903260001