Country Risk and Sustainable Development: Mediating Role of Economic Growth

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 31, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00167
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri
PhD Scholar, Lahore School of Accountancy and Finance, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
Amjad Ali
Associate Professor, Lahore School of Accountancy and Finance, The University of Lahore, Pakistan
Mehboob Alam
Associate Dean, Lahore School of Accountancy and Finance, The University of Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

Sustainable development is of great significance for present and future generations. This study examines the mediation role of economic growth on sustainable development through country risk. We have employed the structural equation modeling (SEM) technique to examine the direct and indirect effects of exogenous and endogenous variables. We conducted this analysis using a sample of 24 countries that contributed approximately 65% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 2000 to 2019. The empirical analysis based on direct effects establishes that country risk reduces economic growth and sustainable development. Interestingly, the empirics of indirect effects reveal that country risk has a positive and significant indirect impact on sustainable development by using economic growth as a mediator. Moreover, the negative direct effect of country risk on sustainable development is greater than the total negative effect due to the positive indirect effect. Finally, policymakers should minimize country risk to promote economic growth, ensuring environmental, social, and economic sustainability for the safety of current and future generations.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Sulehri, F.A. , Ali, A. and Alam, M. 2024. Country Risk and Sustainable Development: Mediating Role of Economic Growth. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 1 (Mar. 2024), 54–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00167.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Adamowicz, M. (2022). Green Deal, Green Growth and Green Economy as a Means of Support for Attaining the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(10), 5901.
  2. Ali, A. (2015). The Impact of Macroeconomic Instability on Social Progress: An Empirical Analysis of Pakistan. Ph.D Dissertation. NCBA&E, Lahore, Pakistan., 1-152.
  3. Ali, A., & Audi, M. (2016). The Impact of Income Inequality, Environmental Degradation and Globalization on Life Expectancy in Pakistan: An Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), 4(4), 182-193.
  4. Ali, A., & Audi, M. (2018). Macroeconomic Environment and Taxes Revenues in Pakistan: An Application of ARDL Approach. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 7(1), 30–39.
  5. Ali, A., & Rehman, H. U. (2015). Macroeconomic instability and its impact on gross domestic product: an empirical analysis of Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 285-316.
  6. Ali, A., Audi, M., & Roussel, Y. (2021). Natural resources depletion, renewable energy consumption and environmental degradation: A comparative analysis of developed and developing world. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(3), 251-260.
  7. Ali, A., Audi, M., Bibi, C., & Roussel, Y. (2021). The impact of gender inequality and environmental degradation on human well-being in the case of Pakistan: A time series analysis. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 11(2), 92-99.
  8. Ali, A., Audi, M., Senturk, I., & Roussel, Y. (2022). Do sectoral growth promote CO2 emissions in Pakistan?: time series analysis in presence of structural break. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(2), 410-425.
  9. Ali, A., Siddique, H. M. A., & Ashiq, S. (2023). Impact of Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Urbanization on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Policy Research, 9(3), 130-140.
  10. Alola, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2021). Mirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 293(June), 112890.
  11. Audi, M., & Ali, A. (2017). Environmental degradation, energy consumption, population density and Economic development in Lebanon: A time series analysis (1971-2014). Journal of International Finance and Economics, 17(1), 7-20.
  12. Audi, M., & Ali, A. (2018). Determinants of environmental degradation under the perspective of globalization: a panel analysis of selected MENA nations. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 18(1), 149-166.
  13. Audi, M., & Ali, A. (2023). The role of environmental conditions and purchasing power parity in determining quality of life among big Asian cities. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(3), 292-305.
  14. Audi, M., & Ali, A. (2023). Unveiling the Role of Business Freedom to Determine Environmental Degradation in Developing Countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(5), 157-164.
  15. Audi, M., Ali, A., & Kassem, M. (2020). Greenhouse gases: A review of losses and benefits. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(1), 403-418.
  16. Audi, M., Sulehri, F. A., Ali, A., & Al-masri, R. (2023). Role of Terrorist Events in Determining Stock Returns in Pakistan : Covering Most Vibrant Era 2003-2013.
  17. Balaram, V. (2023). Combating Climate Change and Global Warming for a Sustainable Living in Harmony with Nature. Journal of Geographical Research, 6(3), 1–17.
  18. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future. In World Commission on Environment and Development.
  19. Cain, M. (2021). Structural Equation Modeling using Stata. Journal of Behavioral Data Science, 1(2), 156–177.
  20. Caro, E. J. (2017). Effects of Macroeconomic Factors in the Performance of Micro Finance Institutions in Ecuador. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(5), 547–551.
  21. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.
  22. Chu, E. W., & Karr, J. R. (2017). Environmental Impact: Concept, Consequences, Measurement. In Reference Module in Life Sciences (pp. 1–22).
  23. Davies, G. R. (2013). Appraising Weak and Strong Sustainability: Searching for a Middle Ground. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1), 111–124.
  24. Eisenmenger, N., Pichler, M., Krenmayr, N., Noll, D., Plank, B., Schalmann, E., Wandl, M. T., & Gingrich, S. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1101–1110.
  25. Glasser, R., Johnstone, C., & Kapetas, A. (2022). The geopolitics of climate and security in the Indo-Pacific. In Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
  26. Hassan, T. A., Schreger, J., Schwedeler, M., & Tahoun, A. (2021). Country Risk. Institute for New Economic Thinking, 62(157), 1089–1094.
  27. Hickel, J. (2020). The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene. Ecological Economics, 167(1), 106331.
  28. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23.
  29. Hoti, S., Chan, F., & McAleer, M. (2002). Structure and Asymptotic Theory for Multivariate Asymmetric Volatility: Empirical Evidence for Country Risk Ratings*. In Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society, Brisbane, Australia.
  30. Jenatabadi, H. S. (2015). An Overview of Path Analysis: Mediation Analysis Concept in Structural Equation Modeling. ArXiv, 1504(03441), 1–12.
  31. Jenkins, W., & Bauman, W. (2010). Berkshire Encyclopedia of sustainability. In The spirit of sustainability (Vols. 1–2, pp. 169–197).
  32. Johnston, R. B. (2016). Arsenic and the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability - Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Arsenic in the Environment, AS 2016, 12–14.
  33. Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202.
  34. Klarin, T. (2018). The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 21(1), 67–94.
  35. Kyriacou, G. A. (2022). Policies for investing in sustainable growth: risks and opportunities in the current macroeconomic environment (pp. 1–35).
  36. Li, Y. (2023). Analysis of the Macroeconomic Environment in the United States and China for Tesla Model 3. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 7(3), 152–160.
  37. Mangukiya, R. D., & Sklarew, D. M. (2023). Analyzing three pillars of sustainable development goals at sub-national scales within the USA. World Development Sustainability, 2(December 2022), 100058.
  38. Markanday, A., & Galarraga, I. (2022). The power of impact framing and experience for determining acceptable levels of climate chnage-induced flood risk: a lab experiment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 27(2), 1–33.
  39. Mushafiq, M., & Prusak, B. (2023). Nexus between stock markets, economic strength, R&D and environmental deterioration: new evidence from EU-27 using PNARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 32965–32984.
  40. Okunbanjo, O. I., Ojenike, J. O., & Fakunmoju, S. K. (2022). Macroeconomic environment factors and small businesses credit accessibility. Ekonomicko-Manazerske Spektrum, 16(1), 76–90.
  41. Paul, B. D. (2008). A history of the concept of sustainable development: Literature review. The Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 17(2), 576–580.
  42. Peiró-Signes, Á., Cervelló Royo, R., & Segarra Oña, M. (2022). Can a country’s environmental sustainability exert influence on its economic and financial situation? The relationship between environmental performance indicators and country risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375(9), 134121.
  43. Pogge, T. (2004). The First United Nations Millennium Development Goal: A cause for celebration? Journal of Human Development, 5(3), 377–397.
  44. Rubin, R. (1999). A History of the concept of Sustainable Development: Literature Review. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 18(2 SPEC. ISS.), 11–19.
  45. Shahid, M., & Ali, A. (2015). The impact of decentralized economic affairs expenditures on economic growth: A time series analysis of Pakistan. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 4(3), 136-148.
  46. Sharpley, R. (2000). Tourism and sustainable development: Exploring the theoretical divide. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(1), 1–19.
  47. Stoenoiu, C. E. (2022). Sustainable Development. A Path to a Better Future. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(15), 1–13.
  48. Sulehri, F. A. (2024). Nexus among Financial Derivatives’ Exposure, Sustainable Development, and Macroeconomic Environment. Lahore School of Accountancy and Finance, University of Lahore, Pakistan. Unpublished PhD Dissertation.
  49. Sulehri, F. A., & Ali, A. (2020). Impact of Political Uncertainty on Pakistan Stock Exchange: An Event Study Approach. Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance, 11(2), 187–200.
  50. Sulehri, F. A., Sulehri, S. S., & Sulehri, R. (2023). Unveiling Economic Distress in South Asia: Does Stock Market Performance Matter? Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(2), 447–456.
  51. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1995). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth (pp. 1-17). In New Society Publishers (Edition 09).

Most read articles by the same author(s)