Cultural Background and Reading Strategies: A Study Based on the Sociocultural and Constructive ESL Approach

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00211
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sunaina Razzaq
BS Scholar, Department of English, Government College Women University, Sialkot
Choudhry Shahid
Professor, Department of English, Institute of Southern Punjab, Multan

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to establish the effect of cultural background on reading strategy and preference of learners of English Language from urban and rural origins. The purpose revolves around the need to discover more about how cultural factors interact with learners’ attitudes and what kind of reading in English, what type of material they prefer, and how their cultural background hinders them. This research is qualitative research and the participants were sampled purposively 10 of which five were selected from the urban areas while the other five were selected from the rural area. Data collection includes interviews with the participants and also, reading of texts in English, with special attention to how students approach the respective texts. The framework of the present study is drawn from sociocultural theory and constructivism which pays attention to the cultural and social aspects of learning. The research findings indicate that the nature of learning settings that learners are subjected to, as a result of the difference in accessibility to urban and rural environments, results in the development of different reading strategies and preferences. Urban learners use more comprehensive and interventionist approaches to reading and have a higher inclination towards E-learning resources, in contrast to the rural learners who have a more conventional approach towards their reading skills and believe in book reading but face difficulty regarding issues of resource scarcity and exposure to English. This is because the study holds several implications concerning the teaching of English in Institutions as well as the construction of its curriculum. It reveals the practical importance of possessing a set of culturally appropriate approaches for teaching multicultural students. Thus, urban learners’ integration of digital and textbook materials can further engagement, while rural learners need more scaffolding and access to textbooks and other types of materials. The implications of this study for future research are clear; more research needs to be earmarked for the development of reading strategies and syndromes; cross-sectional studies need to follow students for longer periods to observe the changes of the reading strategies; and comparative studies need to focus on cultural differences or, at least, use the existing data to investigate the effects of culture on reading strategies.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Razzaq, S. and Shahid, C. 2024. Cultural Background and Reading Strategies: A Study Based on the Sociocultural and Constructive ESL Approach. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 2 (Jun. 2024), 97–106. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00211.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05384.x
  2. Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  3. Block, E. L. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586295
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
  6. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
  7. Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb02534.x
  8. Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587536
  9. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  11. Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900211
  12. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906
  13. Goodman, K. S. (1986). What's whole in whole language? Heinemann.
  14. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education.
  15. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
  16. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1174
  17. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
  18. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  19. Jiang, X. (2001). The role of first language in foreign language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 3(2), 1-10.
  20. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524841
  21. Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(1), 1-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1
  22. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
  23. McKay, S. L. (2006). EFL reading: Attitudes, strategies, and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. McKay, S. L. (2006). EIL, ESL, and EFL: Global issues and local interests. In S. L. McKay & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 72-97). Cambridge University Press.
  25. Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52(2), 439-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00189
  26. Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently...and why. Free Press.
  27. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000309
  28. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  29. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.
  30. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11168-000
  31. Shen, H. H. (2005). An investigation of Chinese-character learning strategies among non-native speakers of Chinese. System, 33(1), 49-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.11.001
  32. Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 10-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/747429
  33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  35. Wenden, A. L. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. Prentice Hall.