Analyzing the Challenges and Strategies of Teaching Reading Comprehension to English Language Learners with Learning Disabilities

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 1, 2024
https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00314
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): Journal of Policy Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ainee Munir
Scholar, BS English, Superior University Lahore
Samia Rafique
Scholar, MS English University of Sialkot, Sialkot
Choudhry Shahid
Professor, Department of English Institute of Southern Punjab, Multan

Abstract

This qualitative study explores the difficulties and approaches related to enhancing ELL students' reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities in Lahore District, Pakistan. The aim of this study was to explore the general difficulties faced by ELLs with learning disabilities in comprehending written material and identifying effective strategies for teaching these students. The study participants are five teachers currently practising special education, all with a minimum of 5 years of experience in teaching in the Lahore district, Pakistan. The methodology used is interviews with teachers and the data collected is analysed through the approach of thematic analysis. The theoretical background for the study was Vygotsky’s concept of ZPD, as the latter focuses on the notion that certain tasks should be slightly beyond the learner’s immediate grasp. Linguistic challenges emerged as a result of language barriers, cultural issues rooted in diverse cultural backgrounds, and environmental constraints that hindered the provision of special education due to limited resources. Key teaching practices that earlier have been described as effective include the use of graphic aids and organizers, differentiated and individualized approaches to student instruction, and culturally related instructions. The general implications of the study are the need for continuous professional development of teachers; the integration and collaboration between special education teachers and other stakeholders and the general need for education, learning, and development of ELL learners with learning disabilities. In sum, this study emphasized the need to support ELLs with learning disabilities in Pakistani language teaching contexts about reading comprehension and provided useful recommendations and suggestions to practitioners and policymakers for improving the poor reading skills that characterize this group of learners.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
[1]
Munir, A. , Rafique, S. and Shahid, C. 2024. Analyzing the Challenges and Strategies of Teaching Reading Comprehension to English Language Learners with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 3 (Sep. 2024), 29–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00314.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abedi, J., & Herman, J. (2010). Assessing ELLs' Reading Comprehension. Leadership Compass, 8(1), 1-8.
  2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Learning disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/LD/
  3. Artiles, A. J., & Kozleski, E. B. (2007). Beyond research on cultural minorities: Challenges and implications of research as situated cultural practice. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 392-408.
  4. August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Baker, J. M., & Zigmond, N. (2014). Involving parents in the literacy development of their children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(3), 171-183.
  6. Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. (2016a). Assistive technology: What every educator needs to know. Pearson.
  7. Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. (2016b). Technology tools for students with learning disabilities: Supporting classroom learning. Guilford Publications.
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  10. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Multilingual Matters.
  11. Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 71-83). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_36
  12. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2016). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. Pearson.
  13. Gargiulo, R. M., & Bouck, E. C. (2018). Special education in contemporary society: An introduction to exceptionality. Sage Publications.
  14. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  15. Gersten, R., Baker, S., Smith-Johnson, J., Dimino, J., & Peterson, A. (2008). Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 32-37.
  16. Harry, B., & Klingner, J. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. Teachers College Press.
  17. Huang, S. (2019). The Importance of Reading Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(6), 1175-1180.
  18. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
  19. Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving Adolescent Literacy: Effective Classroom and Intervention Practices: A Practice Guide (NCEE #2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  20. Kim, J. (2020). Reading Comprehension Strategies for English Language Learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(4), 404-418.
  21. Liang, L., & Dole, J. A. (2006). Obstacles to Reading Comprehension for ESL Students. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 67-81.
  22. Loreti, M. (2014). Teaching English to Students with Learning Disabilities: Issues, Challenges, and Strategies. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 87-95.
  23. Mahmood, S. (2016). English Language Teaching in Pakistan: A Case Study of Teachers’ Attitudes and Strategies for Teaching English as a Second Language. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 3(1), 184-200.
  24. Nieto, S. (2002). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives for a new century. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  25. Snow, C. E., & Biancarosa, G. (2003). Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here? New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
  26. Swanson, H. L., & O'Connor, R. (2009). The Role of Working Memory and Fluency Practice on the Reading Comprehension of Students Who Are Dysfluent Readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(6), 548-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338742
  27. Tariq, R. (2018). Challenges of English Language Teaching in Pakistan: Teachers’ Perspective. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 17-30.
  28. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.